BaysideNOW
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  About this Blog       Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » Julie Siegel (RSS)

Related Tags

Siegel, Fehring, Christensen Win

By Kevin Buckley
Tuesday, Apr 1 2008, 11:06 PM

First, I'd like to welcome the hundreds of new readers to this blog.  Blog traffic has been 10 times normal this week, and I hope I've provided a service to the public with this election series.  Stick around. 

When I first started writing about Whitefish Bay's election, I attempted to be an objective observer for the public.  I admitted I would make endorsements at the end of the race.  After interviewing all the candidates, it was easy to select who I wanted to vote for .. it was excruciating writing about it.  It's tough to pick one person over another and let the world know about it. 

First, the judicial race.  Christensen trounced Peterson by 26 points.  How did that happen?  Christensen ran a great campaign.  He was out shaking hands on the street, in front of schools.  Sent out a couple smartly targeted mailings.  At first, I didn't get it.   It is a municipal judge race.  Why work so hard?  The answer is: to win.  Lots of effort = lots of votes.

I was at Christensen's house for their election party .. I've never been to one before.  I admit, it was pretty exciting hearing the results read off. 

As for the Trustee race, Siegel was the top vote getter, with Fehring 3% behind.  Siegel won the same way the Judicial race was won, with effort.  She bought and planted a large number of lawn signs, brightly colored, with good placement, and that makes a huge difference. 

Fee losing was slightly surprising, as incumbents rarely lose.  But how many voters actually could name their Trustee?  Probably not many.  This was Fee's first contested election, and I think he struggled to find his stride.  I don't recall getting any literature from his campaign.   I had endorsed Fee, as I was impressed with his skills, and believe the board will miss his voice.

I am unabashedly pleased that Tom Fehring won a seat on the Board.  I met Tom through writing this blog, as he had a number of ideas to share about Silver Spring's renewal.  When I realized the Trustee race was going to be uncontested, I thought of Tom and encouraged him to run.  I'd like to believe I goaded him in to running, but I'll bet it was his wife who wanted him out of the house.  Fehring ran a smart campaign, and will be a fantastic addition to the Village Board.

Pritchard won handily by 35+ points over the withdrawn-Weas.  I wouldn't say that all 32% of Weas' votes were "protest" votes against Pritchard .. Maybe half of them.  The other half are people who probably couldn't name the current Village Board President.   Pritchard is a solid leader for our Village, and if you don't think so, you're not paying attention.

The school board race results are not available on-line.  One would guess Marie Greco and Jim Phillips won by large margins over the late write in candidate.


 

WFB Trustee Candidate Interview: Julie Siegel

By Kevin Buckley
Saturday, Dec 15 2007, 08:57 AM

You might have missed this blurb on the WhitefishBayNOW website:

As of today, Julie Siegel, 42, of 5267 N. Diversey Blvd., is the first to file for one of the two seats available in April on the Whitefish Bay Village Board.  Incumbent Kenneth Berg announced he will step down. The other incumbent is Trustee David Fee.

With the dearth of village coverage from the print media, I'll step up to write about the April election in Whitefish Bay.  It's an odd position, and I remind all that I am not a journalist.  I will be as fair as possible in these beginning months.  I'll try to talk to each candidate and get their views on Whitefish Bay and its direction.  I will, on occasion, interject opinion, and will probably write endorsements at the end of the process. 

JULIE SIEGEL

I contacted Julie Siegel, our first candidate for the two spots on the Whitefish Bay Village Board of Trustees.  I spoke to her for about 45 minutes, and asked her a range of questions, from her educational background to specific issues that will be discussed in this election. 

Julie grew up in Shorewood, and moved to Whitefish Bay 16 years ago.  She has a Finance degree, as well as a Masters degree in Social Work from UW-Milwaukee.  She has previously worked in Real Estate, and had been working at St. Michael's as a social worker, but left her job two years back to attend to her family.

Her husband, Roger, works in real estate and has been recently been appointed to WFB's Community Development Authority (CDA).  Her father, Samuel Dickman, is the Village Board President in Bayside.  She said she'd considered running for Trustee before, and explained her father had encouraged her to investigate recently.

I asked about how her nomination process went .. she said her kids laughed at (with) her as she went into Sendik's and bumped into people she knew, to get the 20 signatures required for nomination.

Why is she running?  "I love Whitefish Bay," she said, "I love living here, it's a great place with good schools and a quality community."  She mentioned the 4th of July Parade and Great Pumpkin displays as some of her favorite civic moments. 

I asked for her thoughts on the re-development of Silver Spring.  She had attended the Panel Meeting in November, and found Joe Bartolotta's ideas on Silver Spring to be helpful.  She wasn't sure what she would like to see on Silver Spring, noting that, as Bartolotta had, rents are prohibitively high for restaurants to be successful.  She was generally accepting of creating a Business Improvement District (BID) Board, but wasn't sure if it was for the Trustees to form.  As an alternative, she suggested having one realtor in charge of marketing the district.

Generally, she said, it was important to keep the scale appropriate for any new buildings on Silver Spring, and that anything new be considerate of the immediate neighbors.  I did ask if she believed the "pace" of action on Silver Spring was too slow, too fast, or just right .. she had no comment because she was "new to the process". 

We also spoke about another issue that has concerned Whitefish Bay over the last few years, namely, the handful of homes that have been torn down to make way for new, bigger homes.  She didn't have a specific answer, but suggested that as long as the new homes fit the scale of the neighborhood, and that the developer is following the zoning regulations, it was acceptable.

Finally, she said she was going to research the issues of Whitefish Bay by talking to the Village Manager, and by going door to door to get a feel for what residents think is important.  She ended with the idea that she would work hard for the village, that she was open minded and willing to listen to concerns and find out answers to questions she didn't know.

---

Admittedly, this is a very premature interview with of a candidate who had just filed nomination papers, and hadn't formed positions on the issues that face our Village.  I appreciate the time she gave to me, and will try to follow up with Siegel later to hear more specific answers on her vision for the village.

I would also like to add that Whitefish Bay needs candidates for these positions.  Government doesn't work well with politicians who run unopposed, when voters have no choices, and no ability to pick the better woman or man.    As Ken Berg leaves the board, he takes with him some 15 years of experience, and leaves a big hole to fill.  Whitefish Bay faces serious issues each year, and we need some of the best and brightest to step forward and lead.

I will find out the specifics, but I believe the deadline to file nomination papers is the first week in January, 2008, so the clock is ticking!


 
More Posts

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

Search the Blogs